States can continue operating hemp programs under 2014 Farm Bill

States are now free to operate hemp programs through the fall of 2021 under authorizations provided by the 2014 Farm Bill.

Josh Long, Associate editorial director, SupplySide Supplement Journal

October 5, 2020

5 Min Read
SupplySide Supplement Journal logo in a gray background | SupplySide Supplement Journal

A continuing resolution signed last week by President Donald Trump allows states to continue to operate hemp programs under authorizations provided by the 2014 Farm Bill.

Without the continuing resolution, states needed to transition soon to rules for domestic hemp production adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which faced heat over various components of its interim final rule published in 2019.

USDA’s “initial foray into regulating the growth and processing of hemp has caused much heartache for U.S. hemp farmers, in that it does not provide the kind of flexibility on issues like THC testing, hot hemp disposal and plant sampling that farmers need in order to successfully profit from their hemp crops,” the U.S. Hemp Roundtable said in a recent legislative update. “That’s why nearly two dozen state hemp programs have chosen to continue to operate under the authorizations provided by the 2014 Farm Bill, which are more flexible than the IFR.”

The continuing resolution includes an extension of the 2014 Farm Bill protections to Sept. 30, 2021, the U.S. Hemp Roundtable said.

"Before the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other Extensions Act became law, states and tribes operating under the 2014 pilot program authority were allowed to do so only until October 31, 2020," a USDA spokesperson said in an email. "After that date, states administering a hemp production program were to have a USDA-approved hemp production plan or, if a state did not have a USDA-approved plan, growers in that state could apply for a USDA hemp production license unless prohibited by applicable state law. USDA is still reviewing the provisions of this recently enacted law to determine its implications for the U.S. Domestic Hemp Production Program."

Jared Polis, the governor of Colorado, which has been farming hemp for several years, was pleased with the recent development.

“We worked closely with our federal delegation to ensure this provision to extend the 2014 Farm Bill and the hemp act was included in this continuing resolution,” Polis said in a statement. “Colorado is a national leader in the hemp industry and I’m glad to see this bill be signed into law as it gives our farmers and ranchers from the Eastern Plains, to the Western Slope, the San Luis Valley and everywhere in between more support, and gives Colorado more time to work with the USDA on our state’s hemp framework. This is a great step forward and we will continue working to grow the industry in Colorado.”

Under the terms of the 2014 Farm Bill, the hemp sector in Colorado has thrived, according to a Sept. 18 letter to Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colorado) from several industry lawyers and other stakeholders.

“However, this new robust sector of the industry will face numerous detrimental and crippling constraints upon full implementation of the 2018 Farm Bill and the USDA IFR, as currently drafted,” the letter warned. "As you are aware, stakeholders throughout Colorado (and nationwide), including both government and industry, continue to voice their numerous concerns related to several untenable standards contained in the USDA IFR." 

The letter was signed by representatives of Buscher Law LLC, Colorado Hemp Industries Association, Hemp Industries Association, Hoban Law Group P.C., Functional Remedies LLC, National Cannabis Industry Association and Vicente Sederberg LLP.

After the 2014 Farm Bill was signed into law, farmers started growing hemp under pilot programs. But following passage of the 2018 Farm Bill, which removed hemp from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), states faced a deadline of Oct. 31, 2020, to submit final plans to USDA for approval as the pilot program was expiring, according to the National Industrial Hemp Council (NIHC).

“The global pandemic has presented obstacles for state departments of agriculture to finalize plans and submit them to the USDA for approval,” NIHC said in a Sept. 30 news release, commenting on the continuing resolution after it was passed by the Senate.

USDA in September reopened the comment period to its interim final rule governing domestic hemp production. It granted the public an opportunity to comment through Oct. 8.

The rule outlined provisions for USDA to approve plans submitted by states and Indian tribes for the domestic production of hemp, and it established a federal plan for producers in states or territories of Indian tribes that do not have their own USDA-approved plan.

To date, USDA has approved hemp production plans submitted by several tribal governments and states, including: Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wyoming. USDA is reviewing plans submitted by several other tribal governments and states, including Arizona, Connecticut, Kentucky and Michigan, among others, according to a USDA webpage.

Over the summer, Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-New York) called on USDA to delay until 2022 its final rule on domestic hemp production and allow hemp growers and producers across the U.S. to continue to operate under the 2014 Farm Bill pilot program regulations until that time.

USDA's interim rule would "negatively" impact more than 700 farmers across New York, Allan Gandelman, president of New York Cannabis Growers and Processors Association, said in a news release issued Aug. 7 by Schumer's office. 

"The costs and bureaucracy of implementing the new rules as written create unnecessary financial burdens on farmers and our state agencies," Gandelman added. "The existing hemp pilot program has been sufficient in making sure farmers are compliant with all testing and public safety protocols."

About the Author

Josh Long

Associate editorial director, SupplySide Supplement Journal , Informa Markets Health and Nutrition

Josh Long directs the online news, feature and op-ed coverage at SupplySide Supplement Journal (formerly known as Natural Products Insider), which targets the health and wellness industry. He has been reporting on developments in the dietary supplement industry for over a decade, with a focus on regulatory issues, including at the Food and Drug Administration.

He has moderated and/or presented at industry trade shows, including SupplySide East, SupplySide West, Natural Products Expo West, NBJ Summit and the annual Dietary Supplement Regulatory Summit.

Connect with Josh on LinkedIn and ping him with story ideas at [email protected]

Education and previous experience

Josh majored in journalism and graduated from Arizona State University the same year "Jake the Snake" Plummer led the Sun Devils to the Rose Bowl against the Ohio State Buckeyes. He also holds a J.D. from the University of Wyoming College of Law, was admitted in 2008 to practice law in the state of Colorado and spent a year clerking for a state district court judge.

Over more than a quarter century, he’s written on various topics for newspapers and business-to-business publications – from the Yavapai in Arizona and a controversial plan for a nuclear-waste incinerator in Idaho to nuanced issues, including FDA enforcement of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA).

Since the late 1990s, his articles have been published in a variety of media, including but not limited to, the Cape Cod Times (in Massachusetts), Sedona Red Rock News (in Arizona), Denver Post (in Colorado), Casper Star-Tribune (in Wyoming), now-defunct Jackson Hole Guide (in Wyoming), Colorado Lawyer (published by the Colorado Bar Association) and Nutrition Business Journal.

Subscribe for the latest consumer trends, trade news, nutrition science and regulatory updates in the supplement industry!
Join 37,000+ members. Yes, it's completely free.

You May Also Like