Cyanotech, Valensa Agree to Settle Long-Standing Patent Dispute

The University of Illinois, which owned the patent, and Valensa, which licensed certain rights under it, alleged the patent method claims covered the manufacturing, marketing and sales of astaxanthin as a nutritional supplement.

Josh Long, Associate editorial director, SupplySide Supplement Journal

November 24, 2014

2 Min Read
SupplySide Supplement Journal logo in a gray background | SupplySide Supplement Journal

Cyanotech Corp., a developer of microalgae technology, has reached an agreement to resolve a long-running patent dispute with Valensa International and the University of Illinois Board of Trustees.

The parties have agreed to confidential terms of a settlement and anticipate filing a joint motion to dismiss a federal lawsuit and administrative proceeding by Dec. 1, according to a Nov. 13 regulatory filing.

In 2012, U.S. Nutraceuticals LLC (doing business as Valensa International) and the university trustees board sued Cyanotech and its subsidiary Nutrex Hawaii Inc., a provider of supplements, alleging infringement of patent 5,527,533.

The ‘533 patent is described as a method for ameliorating certain diseases, injuries or damage through the administration of astaxanthin, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Cyanotech, whose microalgae-derived products are produced on the Kona Coast of Hawaii, markets astaxanthin as a natural health supplement.

Cyanotech later petitioned the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to review the patent’s validity. On Dec. 19, 2013, PTAB began an inter partes review of 18 of 27 claims within the patent, according to the filing.

Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief was recently rendered moot because the 18-year-old patent at issue expired on Oct. 27, 2014, according to regulatory filings.

The University of Illinois, which owned the patent, and Valensa, which licensed certain rights under it, alleged the patent method claims covered the manufacturing, marketing and sales of astaxanthin as a nutritional supplement, according to regulatory filings. Cyanotech denied the allegations and filed counterclaims in the federal lawsuit.

The parties invested a significant amount of time and resources litigating the case, with discovery on factual issues concluding in July. Last year, Cyanotech’s general and administrative expenses rose by UDS $666,000 or 17 percent, thanks in part to an increase in legal fees of $520,000, the company disclosed in a June 27, 2014 regulatory filing.

A trial in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida was scheduled for March 2, 2015, and the PTAB was expected to issue a ruling by Dec. 19, 2014.

Cyanotech and Valensa did not respond to requests for comment on the settlement.

For a detailed analysis of patent infringement issues, check out lawyer Rakesh Amin’s Oct. 2, 2014 article published in Natural Products INSIDER.

About the Author

Josh Long

Associate editorial director, SupplySide Supplement Journal , Informa Markets Health and Nutrition

Josh Long directs the online news, feature and op-ed coverage at SupplySide Supplement Journal (formerly known as Natural Products Insider), which targets the health and wellness industry. He has been reporting on developments in the dietary supplement industry for over a decade, with a focus on regulatory issues, including at the Food and Drug Administration.

He has moderated and/or presented at industry trade shows, including SupplySide East, SupplySide West, Natural Products Expo West, NBJ Summit and the annual Dietary Supplement Regulatory Summit.

Connect with Josh on LinkedIn and ping him with story ideas at [email protected]

Education and previous experience

Josh majored in journalism and graduated from Arizona State University the same year "Jake the Snake" Plummer led the Sun Devils to the Rose Bowl against the Ohio State Buckeyes. He also holds a J.D. from the University of Wyoming College of Law, was admitted in 2008 to practice law in the state of Colorado and spent a year clerking for a state district court judge.

Over more than a quarter century, he’s written on various topics for newspapers and business-to-business publications – from the Yavapai in Arizona and a controversial plan for a nuclear-waste incinerator in Idaho to nuanced issues, including FDA enforcement of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA).

Since the late 1990s, his articles have been published in a variety of media, including but not limited to, the Cape Cod Times (in Massachusetts), Sedona Red Rock News (in Arizona), Denver Post (in Colorado), Casper Star-Tribune (in Wyoming), now-defunct Jackson Hole Guide (in Wyoming), Colorado Lawyer (published by the Colorado Bar Association) and Nutrition Business Journal.

Subscribe for the latest consumer trends, trade news, nutrition science and regulatory updates in the supplement industry!
Join 37,000+ members. Yes, it's completely free.

You May Also Like