FAO: Some Regulation of Food Futures is OK

June 24, 2010

2 Min Read
SupplySide Supplement Journal logo in a gray background | SupplySide Supplement Journal

ROMESome regulation of commodities futures markets is desirable, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
In a policy brief, FAO said the worldwide rise in food prices two years ago "might have been amplified by speculators in organized futures markets. However, limiting or banning speculative trading might do more harm than good."
While futures speculation appeared to have affected prices in the short term only, efforts to reduce such speculation might have unintended, longer-term consequences, the paper said. Any limitations could "divert speculators from trading and thus lower the liquidity in the markets available for hedging purposes".
Futures contracts involve the formal obligation to sell or buy a given amount of a commodity at a specified time and price. They provide farmers and traders with an important defense, or "hedge," against price risks.
However, only two percent of futures contracts actually end in the delivery of the physical commodity as they are generally traded before their expiration date. As a result such contracts, or obligations, are drawing growing numbers of financial speculators and investors, especially as they can provide attractive returns when equities and bonds may become unappealing.  
Large commodity funds now hold about 25-35 percent of all agriculture futures contracts and, with other investors, have become an important source of liquidity to the market.
But mechanisms to intervene in future markets if prices rise too sharply might divert speculators from trading and thus make less money available for important hedging purposes.
Accordingly, "proposals to create an international fund to react to price hikes might therefore not be an optimal solution," the paper cautioned. "What is more, such a fund would require exorbitant resources to counteract speculation effectively," it noted.
Instead, regulatory measures should aim primarily at enhancing confidence in the good functioning of the market. One way this could be achieved, the brief continued, was by increasing transparency and the amount of available information on futures trading. Another would be to closely investigate any instances of suspicious behavior by traders, as already practiced by the US futures trading supervisory body.
"Commodity futures have become an integral part of the food market, and they perform an important role for many market participants. Adequate regulation should improve, not ban, speculative trading in order to foster market performance," the brief concluded.     

 

 

Subscribe for the latest consumer trends, trade news, nutrition science and regulatory updates in the supplement industry!
Join 37,000+ members. Yes, it's completely free.

You May Also Like