Monsanto 'Suspicious' of GMO Wheat in Oregon Field

Josh Long, Associate editorial director, SupplySide Supplement Journal

June 24, 2013

3 Min Read
SupplySide Supplement Journal logo in a gray background | SupplySide Supplement Journal

St. LOUISA Monsanto Company executive on Friday said the results of an ongoing investigation indicate a genetically-engineered crop that was found on an Oregon farm was intentionally planted by someone other than the farmer.

Robb Fraley, chief technology officer of Monsanto, also told reporters the evidence to date shows the detection of the Roundup Ready wheat is an isolated incident that has not been detected on other farms or entered commerce.

As a genetically modified organism (GMO), Monsanto's Roundup Ready wheat is resistant to the herbicide glyphosate.

The federal government authorized more than 100 field tests of the GMO wheat from 1998 through 2005. Monsanto said the program in Oregon was discontinued 12 years ago.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is investigating how the wheat ended up on the farm. The agency has noted the wheat poses no public health or food-safety concerns, and its investigation thus far also has indicated the detection of the wheat is isolated.

The facts indicate "the strong possibility that someone intentionally introduced wheat seed containing the CP4 event in his field sometime after the farmer initially planted it," Fraley said Friday.

"The evidence now collected, the fact patterns established and the original Roundup Ready CP4 event appearing suddenly after 12 years out of nowhere in a single field in the state of Oregon is highly suspicious," he added.  

Tests of wheat varieties in the Pacific Northwest that Monsanto, USDA and Washington State University conducted have not detected the wheat anywhere else but on the one farm, Fraley noted.

"This is vitally important information for area wheat growers that are now gearing up for harvest in the next couple of weeks," he said. "And this data should also provide confidence to grain handlers in the area and foreign market buyers as well as seed suppliers in the region."

Fraley acknowledged Japan and Korea have temporarily suspended new purchases of soft white wheat, but he said Monsanto is unaware of any wheat orders being cancelled or deliveries of the crop being rejected.

"No other countries have announced purchase restrictions and there has been no adverse effect on wheat prices," Fraley said.

Monsanto and USDA are still trying to figure out how the wheat ended up on a small portion of the 123-acre field. The farmer, who has remained anonymous, is not suspected of any wrongdoing.

We know that the farmer himself never participated in any of the field testing [of the GMO wheat] and to the growers knowledge the field in question was never used in any trials," Fraley said.

Fraley said Monsanto reached out to the farmer's lawyer, who confirmed the genetically-modified wheat "appeared in patches or clumps and appeared here or there in the field."

Had the GMO crop been present in the two seed varieties the farmer planted, it would have been evenly disbursed throughout the field, and following the harvest, the remaining seeds in the field would have germinated, resulting in the wheat plants appearing "uniformly", Fraley said.

Importantly, none of these standard farming practices are consistent with or can explain a smattering of volunteer wheat plants in the field and in only about 1% of that field or as patches or clumps of volunteers. [USDA] Secretary Vilsack also noted earlier this month at the National Press Club this particular circumstance is unusual and odd and very rare," Fraley said.  Our view, this is the pattern you would expect if someone had dispersed the seedthat is had entered the field and sown the seed mechanically or by hand at some point during the subsequent cycle when the field was not being farmed."

About the Author

Josh Long

Associate editorial director, SupplySide Supplement Journal , Informa Markets Health and Nutrition

Josh Long directs the online news, feature and op-ed coverage at SupplySide Supplement Journal (formerly known as Natural Products Insider), which targets the health and wellness industry. He has been reporting on developments in the dietary supplement industry for over a decade, with a focus on regulatory issues, including at the Food and Drug Administration.

He has moderated and/or presented at industry trade shows, including SupplySide East, SupplySide West, Natural Products Expo West, NBJ Summit and the annual Dietary Supplement Regulatory Summit.

Connect with Josh on LinkedIn and ping him with story ideas at [email protected]

Education and previous experience

Josh majored in journalism and graduated from Arizona State University the same year "Jake the Snake" Plummer led the Sun Devils to the Rose Bowl against the Ohio State Buckeyes. He also holds a J.D. from the University of Wyoming College of Law, was admitted in 2008 to practice law in the state of Colorado and spent a year clerking for a state district court judge.

Over more than a quarter century, he’s written on various topics for newspapers and business-to-business publications – from the Yavapai in Arizona and a controversial plan for a nuclear-waste incinerator in Idaho to nuanced issues, including FDA enforcement of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA).

Since the late 1990s, his articles have been published in a variety of media, including but not limited to, the Cape Cod Times (in Massachusetts), Sedona Red Rock News (in Arizona), Denver Post (in Colorado), Casper Star-Tribune (in Wyoming), now-defunct Jackson Hole Guide (in Wyoming), Colorado Lawyer (published by the Colorado Bar Association) and Nutrition Business Journal.

Subscribe for the latest consumer trends, trade news, nutrition science and regulatory updates in the supplement industry!
Join 37,000+ members. Yes, it's completely free.

You May Also Like