Review Says EU Needs to Embrace GMO Foods

April 26, 2013

2 Min Read
SupplySide Supplement Journal logo in a gray background | SupplySide Supplement Journal

BRUSSELSEuropean Union (EU) agricultural policy has been developed in the pursuit of laudable goals, such as a competitive economy and regulatory harmony across the union; however, the EU cannot meet those goals without embracing genetically engineered (GMO) crops, according to a recent review published in the journal Trends in Plant Science.

Scientists at the University of Lleidas Agrotecnio Center based the review on case studies showing that the EU is undermining its own competitiveness in the agricultural sector to its own detriment and that of its humanitarian activities in the developing world.

"Failing such a change, ultimately the EU will become almost entirely dependent on the outside world for food and feed and scientific progress, ironically because the outside world has embraced the technology which is so unpopular in Europe, realizing this is the only way to achieve sustainable agriculture," said Paul Christou of the University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center and Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats.

"Many aspects of the EU agricultural policy, including those concerning GMOs, are internally inconsistent and actively obstruct what the policy sets out to achieve," he said.

For instance, the Lisbon Strategy aims to create a knowledge-based bioeconomy and recognizes the potential of GMOs to deliver it, but EU policy on the cultivation of GMOs has created an environment that makes this impossible. In reality, there is a de facto moratorium in Europe on the cultivation of genetically engineered crops such as maize, cotton, and soybean, even as the same products are imported because there is insufficient capacity to produce them by conventional means at home.

Subsidies designed to support farmers now benefit large producers at the expense of family farms, Christou said. The EU has also banned its farmers from using many pesticides and restricted them from other non-chemical methods of pest control, while allowing food products produced in the same ways to be imported.

"EU farmers are denied freedom of choicein essence, they are prevented from competing because EU policies actively discriminate against those wishing to cultivate genetically engineered crops, yet exactly the same crops are approved for import," he said.

All this, despite the fact that GMOs must pass stringent safety tests and there has been no evidence of harm or health risks, despite more than 15 years of GMO agriculture around the world, he added.

"We recommend the adoption of rational, science-based principles for the harmonization of agricultural policies to prevent economic decline and lower standards of living across the continent," the authors wrote. And that means short-term political expediency must not trump long-term objectives on challenges, including hunger and malnutrition.

For more information about GMO crops, check out the Image Gallery: A History of Genetically Modified Crops on Food Product Design.

Subscribe for the latest consumer trends, trade news, nutrition science and regulatory updates in the supplement industry!
Join 37,000+ members. Yes, it's completely free.

You May Also Like